Why are Tunisians Fleeing from Democracy?

Tunisia is a country which has toppled its dictator: so what are all the Tunisian refugees fleeing from? Democracy?

This pertinent point was raised by Andrew Brons MEP at a recent European Parliament debate on the issue of the tidal wave of so-called refugees pouring over the Mediterranean Sea into Europe after recent convulsions in North Africa.

“Perhaps we should expect to see Mr Ben Ali, a recently retired dictator at the head of the queue,” Mr Brons said.

“Libya is a war zone. But people do not become asylum seekers simply because they live in a dangerous country. There must be something about that particular person that places that person in jeopardy,” he continued.

“The argument seems to be about whether Italy and Malta should accept them for settlement because they are the first country they have reached or whether they should be accepted for settlement by other member states.

“My answer is that neither should accept them for settlement and that they should, sooner or later, be returned to North Africa.

“If EU asylum rules really say that a mere claim to be an asylum seeker is enough to create an obligation to accept them, then the rules must be changed. Rules are man-made, and can be un-made.

“If that means member states, and indeed the EU itself, repudiating other international agreements, then so be it,” Mr Brons said,

“Member states have been changed beyond recognition by migration. The time has come to stop the flow and encourage its reversal.”

* A recent report by Migration Watch UK has shown that more than 50 percent of asylum seekers in Britain only apply for that status after they have been arrested as illegal immigrants.

In a statement marking the 60th anniversary of the signing of the 1951 Refugee Convention, Migration Watch chairman Sir Andrew Green said that the “situation has changed beyond recognition since the Refugee Convention was signed 60 years ago.

“There is now widespread abuse,” Sir Andrew said. “Over half of all applicants in the UK only claim when detected.

“Nearly two thirds (60 percent) of all cases decided in the last five years were rejected after a long and expensive legal process but less than half of them are being removed.

Bookmark the permalink.

One Comment

  1. What would non-White nations like Libya, Egypt, Iraq and/or Iran do if their borders were being illegally and relentlessly beseiged by millions of unwanted European White Christians fleeing from ancestral Europe and further afield?

    The hierarchies of White homelands must enact the same policies as would non-White hierarchies.

    It is time for all White nations to get deadly serious about forming a new White nations only United Nations organisation and withdraw from the present Third World non-White-dominated mafia outfit.

Leave a Reply

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked *