Britain: A Nation of Immigrants?

Two weeks before the 2010 election, Sandy Walkington, a Liberal Democrat candidate for St Albans said, “We’re all mongrels.”

“I mean, this country is the most mongrel country in the world. In 200 years we’ll all be coffee-coloured — and I’ve got no problem with that.”

It is outrageous and deeply offensive that politicians, the media and left-wing celebrities have promoted the lie that we are somehow all basically from mixed breeding stock in order to legitimise the invasion by hordes of foreigners.

Eddie Izzard said in his TV series Mongrel Britain, “our country has been massively diverse for most of its history — a blend of Angles, Saxons, Romans, Vikings, Celts.” But the history of the British people shows that we have been here for thousands of years and that past invasions have contributed no more than five percent to our population.

Izzard speaks with excitement about “rich diversity” and “a dynamic and vibrant mix of foreign genes.” Yet there is nothing vibrant or dynamic about losing your job to cheap Eastern European workers or finding that you can’t spot a white face in your high street.

The diversity he speaks of isn’t rich. The UK is poorer as a result of free handouts for immigrants and gifts to third world countries. Our cultural heritage has been savaged as we are forced to accept barbaric religions and the criminal scamming culture that we always knew was present in poor countries.

How dare they smile condescendingly while they attempt to change history and teach us that we owe everything, as Izzard claims, to “waves of invasion, centuries of immigration and floods of foreign ideas.”

The numbers of invaders were in fact few — mostly only in the tens of thousands and, crucially, all of the invaders’ origins were limited to northern Europe. This is supported fully by up-to-date genetic evidence in the book Four Flags: The Indigenous People of Great Britain by Arthur Kemp.

Kemp presents genetic evidence proving that the vast majority of British people have ancestors going back 12,000 years when haplogroups R1b, I and R1a spread northwards. British people with the R1b1 DNA haplotypes have on average a 74 percent homogeneity, with the remainder coming from countries just across the sea.

Historical records offer proof as well: The Romans invaded in AD 43 with an army of 40–45,000 men but only 16,000 legionaries were stationed here afterwards.

Estimates for the population at that time are around 1.5 million; therefore, the effect of this invasion was one to two percent (Eagles Over Britannia: The Roman Army in Britain by Guy de la Bedoyere).

“In the sixth century the Anglo-Saxon element in the population of Britain amounted to no more than fifty to a hundred thousand” (Arthur’s Britain: History and Archaeology AD 367–634 by Leslie Alcock). Therefore, the Anglo-Saxon contribution would be somewhere between three and six percent. DNA evidence shows that the R1a Haplogroup for Anglo-Saxons in England is 4.5 percent, a remarkable correlation (Kemp, ibid).

Between 789–1104 AD, the Vikings were known for their ferocious attacks on villages but only small numbers actually settled. War bands were tiny: “from seven to thirty-five a band and above three dozen an army” (Anglo-Saxon England by Lloyd and Jennifer Laing).

After the Norman Conquest, William, Duke of Normandy, dismissed his mercenaries and nearly all returned to France. “The probability is that the Continental settlement did not involve more than 10,000 people — and perhaps as few as 5,000” (Offshore Islanders: From Roman Occupation to European Entry by Paul Johnson). “England simply acquired a new ruling class,” writes Johnson.

The Flemish and Walloons came from what is now Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxemburg and parts of northern France and Germany. About 16,000 were recorded in 1440, which was less than one percent. The population at the time was estimated between two and 2.5 million, and had diminished as a result of the Black Death (Roots of the Future: An Education Pack for Exploring Ethnic Diversity in Britain by Peter White).

The Jews also settled at various periods in history but did not approve of marriage to Gentiles. In 1290, the community of around 5,000 was expelled by Edward I.

They returned slowly and by 1815, there were around 20–30,000. Around 55,000 Jews arrived between 1933 and 1939. Britain’s population was at 40 million in 1940, and therefore the Jewish contribution was at most 0.3 percent.

Throughout the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, there was a small trickle of people from all over Europe. In England and Wales, the 1871 census recorded 32,823 Germans, an Italian population of 5,063, again not significant amounts compared to the population of 20 million.

The Commission for Racial Equality (CRE) estimates 50,000 Huguenot and 80,000 French Protestants arrived between 1680 and 1720. About 40,000 of these left for America. However, around 1685, the population of Britain was four to 4.5 million, meaning that the contribution was still only about two percent (White, ibid; and Alien Immigrants to England by W Cunningham).

Between 1600 and 1800, people didn’t welcome foreigners with open arms and intermarriage of any sort was infrequent. Even when William of Orange came to England to unseat the unpopular James II, he was accompanied only by approximately 11,000 foot and 4,000 horse soldiers. The effect of his invasion was once again small.

The marriages between kings and queens of Europe and their relative squabbles did not have much of a bearing on the poor, often starving, ordinary people who mostly stayed where they were for thousands of years.

Possibly one of the best examples is Cheddar Gorge Man who is an example of how people have stayed where they were for thousands of years.

The remains of Cheddar Man were excavated in 1903 and have been dated at around 7,150 BC. In 1996, his DNA was profiled and a sample from 20 residents of a nearby village was taken. It produced two exact matches and one match with a single mutation. The close match was a history teacher named Adrian Targett. What this means is incredible — these people are direct descendants of Cheddar Man and still live in the same area, nearly 10,000 years later.

The historical and genetic evidence support the fact that there is indeed a native people of Britain who have a right to this land. We have as much right as the American Indians, Aborigines or Maoris. There were invasions and a small amount of migration but, as has been already stated, these were from people just across the channel.

So why do they wish to convince us that we are all mixed race? The agenda of previous Labour and Conservative governments have only ever been concerned about re-election at any cost.

They know that importing cheap workers will provide short-term prosperity and thus they will secure re-election. By offering free handouts to immigrants they know that when the time comes they can count on the ethnic vote.

The proof is here. They have betrayed their own people.

The erasure of the native British people today has already begun and it is legitimised by whitewashing over our truthful British history with lies. Don’t stand for it.

By Allan Robertson.

Bookmark the permalink.


  1. 80% British Gene.

    Francis Pryor

    This proves that the Indigenous population are NOT mongrels.

    Maybe it should be pointed out to her that a complaint will be sent in regards to her RACIST comments to the Police for her overt RACISM.

  2. Coming at it from another direction:

    Mongrel Race?
    Mongrel People?
    Don’t you just hate these people who insist on calling us a “Mongrel Race”! If there even was a mongrel Race it would be the Black people of the Americas. The average black American is 28% European, probably similar statistics for Caribbean people and they are mixed up full of all different races` blood including Indian and Amerindian and a bit of Chinese. Yet the same people don’t insist on calling them a Mongrel race do they, or question the right of Caribbeans to call themselves, “Black”.

    The White people of Americans are descendants of a great mixture of different European nationalities yet the same people who call us a Mongrel race don’t insists on calling Americans, A ‘Mongrel’ Race. why, oh, why do some people in this country insist on calling us, our people, our country, a “mongrel nation”?
    We have got to knock this phrase on the head for ever!
    Destroy it!

  3. The Whole World is turning Coffee Coloured?????

    NO, only White countries are turning Coffee coloured, a very dark shade of Coffee colour that is.

    Brown countries are remaining totally Brown
    Black countries are remaining totally Black.

  4. Good article. It would be great to see Arthur Kemp writing again, especially for this website. We cannot afford to lose people of his ilk.

  5. As you know it’s a lie, put about by liberals to undermine us, earlier ‘invasions’ were very minor by comparisson, very often involving an invading army of tens of thousands, who then garrisoned the country.
    Most of the populace were unchanged.
    Here’s some info from Prof Stephen Oppenheimer

    So you can see, in order to carry out their extermination policies they are lying to the British people about our unique genetic inheritence.
    Thoroughly evil people, we are going to need a lot of Prison spaces for these monsters.

  6. Angles, Saxons, Jutes, Celts, Jews, Hugenots etc, etc. Look it don’t matter where we came from, leave all that to the academics. We know who we are. We are British by birth and we own this land, and cherish the culture our ancestors created and will not see it sold out by some snake oil politician on his way to his own selfish self actualisation. We refuse to be swamped and out bred by a multitude of religious nutters who would take the world back in time to the dark ages. I don’t believe in a God so I guess that makes me an atheist, a pejorative term if ever there was. But I am a Christian atheist, if you get my twisted logic. The last thing this country needs, as our scant education of the masses and rejection of the old order kicks in, is the introduction into our society of ISLAM

  7. Nature won’t let it happen. The neighbourhood cats arn’t all one colour and they’re not fussy. Nature always specializes. Now watch what the Iranian Persians do to the NWO in the upcoming 3rd and final part of the energy war. You will see something special.

  8. The ‘debate’ which the left likes to engage us in by proposing that we are a ‘mongrel breed’ is a red herring that they use to make us waste the precious time we so rarely get on tv interviews debating issues of no concern to the electorate such as the ice age Anglo Saxons and Celts etc and so on.

    It is easy for the left to tie us up in such debate which is of no relevance to the issues the voting public are concerned about because of our mixing racial ideology with politics.

    As a previous comment states. We know who we are and we are a people primarily of Northern European descent.

  9. Manxman is right – it’s a deliberate slogan, a time-waster and distraction. What’s needed is some handy riposte, a short slogan which encapsulates the truth, or, better, combines the truth with an implicit counter-attack against these liars.

    The Lib-Dems seem to love his ‘mongrel’ thing, which has certainly been around since the late 1940s – I have a (Jewish publisher) book from that date mentioning it. A Lib Dem friend of mine once told me this, and I’m afraid I was so annoyed I escorted him to the door and out.

  10. It always amazes me how liberals say they love diversity yet they also drive for more integration. Perhaps somebody should tell them that integration by it’s very nature reduces diversity but let’s not let reality get in the way of things i guess..

  11. There is no doubt in my mind that many establishment politicians and the media push this myth for a very purposeful reason. Many of those involved are of course just useful idiots, but the mongrelisation of Britain is a planned operation, I am in no doubt of that. The encouragement of racial interbreeding can be seen time and time again in soap opera stories, advertisements, magazine and newspaper articles about celebrities in mixed marriages. Also real mongrels like Izzard, who want to believe they are no different to the rest of us, are given a platform to push these lies. Calling us all mongrels or a nation of immigrants attempts to reduce the resistance the majority have in allowing the mixing of their peoples genes with that of other very different races. Anyone who dares to disapprove is immediately condemned as a racist. However, the evidence is clear that the vast majority of British natives are descended from the first settlers here after the last Ice Age. I have been frustrated on numerous occasions when trying to put this point across to people who have either been convinced of the mongrel lie, or just as foolishly believe themselves to be pure Celts or Saxons. For those who want to know the truth, try reading “The Origins Of The British” by Stephen Oppenheimer.

  12. Perhaps we are all mongrels?after all I like probably most of the rest of the indigenous people out there have relatives who are from Scotland,Wales,Ireland and many other far flung reaches of this,the British Isles!

  13. Fortunately, most of us Kelto-Saxons are yet still unpolluted and mongrelized, but our opponents are hellbent on destroying us through abortion, contraception, wars, crushing tax & benefits, poverty and race-mixing. Just watch a few current TV ads!

    It is vital for us basically-Christian (not Churchy) Nationalists to know our true Eastern, Mesopotamian, Palestinian, Egyptian, Trojan, Greek and Roman roots, and our glorious patriarchs and ancestors. Only then can we hack through the lies and deception to understand what is really going on today, and who are real enemies are, and their tactics and strategy against us.

    I suggest you turn off your telly and start to read our ancient histories in the Irish and Scottish Chronicles and The Declaration of Arbroath 1320AD. Try and links.

  14. Eddie Izzard is talking hogwash when a basic population is founded it’s virtually impossible to rid them of the land apart from what’s happening now. The average Viking army as with Anglo-Saxon army was small. The Vikings had no intention to change the culture or way of life and they were from neighbouring regions which shared common culture and similar languages anyway.

    It shows Izzard using a multiculturalist view of history to justify whats going on now – shameful!

  15. Multiculturalism by its nature destroys native culture so others can be pushed forward or don’t the idiots in power know this. Integration? Integrate into what if there are no native people locally to integrate with and that’s if the natives choose that to happen of course. All i know is the term England is used in various documents so people knew who they were that’s good enough for me.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *