The official Cabinet Office report on the black riots in London and elsewhere has ignored race as a factor and, pathetically, blamed “moments of madness” and “excitement” for the worst racial disturbances in Britain in a decades.
The report, titled The August Riots in England, is a 68 page document study carried out for the Cabinet Office by the National Centre for Social Research, only mentions race once, on page 47, in the following manner:
“There was a further concern expressed by stakeholders about the portrayal of the riots as a black issue: ‘The media made out it was a black issue – black men doing the rioting and looting, but if you were there, it was people of all races. … It was everyone.’ (Young person, Birmingham).”
And that’s it. Despite the fact that all news coverage showed that the rioters were, with a tiny exception of far leftist anarchists (whose violent nature is most often shown in anti-nationalist “protests”), overwhelmingly of Third World origin.
Once again, the establishment dare not admit that race was a factor in the riots. To do so, would be to admit that the multi-cultural experiment has failed and that the promises of peace and harmony were all lies.
According to the report, the real reasons for the unrest was that “young people joined the summer riots in ‘moments of madness’ on ‘a day like no other when normal rules did not seem to apply.’”
The report fails, of course, to explain what exactly caused this “moment of madness” or why the “normal rules did not apply.” The answer, it seems, is too painful for them to admit.
Without ever mentioning the ethnicity of the rioters, the report quoted some as saying that “My mum said: ‘Don’t you dare go outside the house.’ I was joking: ‘I could go and get myself some new trainers, I could get you some new trainers.”
Of course, the traditional “excuses” are trotted out in the report|: “Poverty, materialism and a sense of belonging to a neighbourhood also played a part in nudging young people towards involvement,” the report said.
Once again, the report dares not ask the question why it is always the Third World immigrant populations who live in the most deprived areas. Furthermore, these sorts of excuses ignore the reality that in some parts of Britain, particularly in the north, there are communities of white people who are equally deprived. Yet somehow they never seem to burn down their town centres in “moments of madness.”
Official government figures showed that people charged over the riots were “poorer, younger and of lower educational achievement than average.”
Now who, we wonder, could that be referring to?
2
I cannot say that I have looked at the report surrounding this issue, but I could not help but give a wry smile at what I saw as an attempt by the BBC news to obscure the issue last week when they were citing the ethnic percentages of those involved.
.
I heard it mentioned on the radio news that something like 46% of those convicted in the courts were black and 42% of them were white. To a unawake listener, that makes it sound like it was half and half, with the black/BME not much more involved than the white society. They would, at that point, go back to sleep, happy in the knowledge that all is even in diversity land.
.
However, as we know, the BME percentage (due to their national demographic figure) are greatly disproportionate in their involvement. Also, I bet a majority of listeners did not also pick up on the dubious nature of the figures pertaining to the rioters being based upon those ‘convicted’ in the courts.
.
It is not that much of a stretch of the imagination to believe that for the sake of this exercise of racial “damage limitation” they over represented whites in the courts, whilst making less effort to track down and prosecute the BME grouping. The correlation between those found and convicted and those who, on the whole, were representative of the actual rioting, are not the same thing.
.
Perhaps it is just my paranoia, lol, but I am sceptical and cynical to these tricks. Tricks which I suspect are being pulled all the time when it comes to what is revealed, hidden, promoted, denied, regarding what is really happening with multiculturalism, multifaith and multiracial society.
.
The BBC like to do it all the time, especially. It could be coincidental, but the odds of it are slim. For example, they were discussing the 7 Billion population issue the other day, and who was there in the studio, representative of the baby boom and over-population of the world story? A little white child, of course. The only racial group which is in decline in this country, in Europe, and the world.
.
The subliminal message, whether they intended it or not, was surely to link overpopulation to whites and to make whites dubious and guilty for bringing this state of affairs on.
.
Seeing as we are one of the most altruistic and sharing peoples of the world, no doubt a meme would have been planted that for the good of the planet, whites should think twice about having larger families, or families at all. This is despite the third world, and third world populace planted worldwide, are the ones driving the boom.
.
I bet when the riots are shown to future generations, or featured in future documentaries the newspapers which showed white youths will be much more prominent than those who were “BME”. This is the kind of game that seems to be played.
.
I seem to remember the United States authorities and other nations suffering mass third world immigration citing the “heat” for disturbances etc. Those of us truly in the know, will know why certain peoples are different to others and what is likely to result from their mass presence here and what is likely to come in the future. Nobody ever really means for it to occur, but like the grim reaper, it eventually comes for all anyway.
.
It’s best not to use the word ‘deprived’. It’s a leftist jargon term which assumes that someone or other (‘society’) is depriving the individual or group in question of something to which they are otherwise entitled.
Actually even those on benefits are getting over a decade of free education, free medical care, free housing, free heating, free clothing, free food and other benefits reserved for the ‘unwaged’. Not to mention money to spare for beer, fags and crisps.
Deprived? My foot. The people who are really deprived are the mugs, the ordinary citizens who have to pay for all this from money they go out and earn to support themselves and their families and which is taken from them in tax.
Taxpayers might agree, if reluctantly in some cases, to this money going to fellow countrymen in times of hardship – people for whom they have a family-like feeling because of a shared history, cuture and religion, and who genuinely need and deserve it.
But they very much resent if when they know it’s going to an alien immigrant underclass for whom they feel no kind of affection or affinity and who have come here (or whose families have come here) mainly for the purpose of getting their hands on some of it.
This underclass is always going to be at the bottom of the sociological heap because it frankly hasn’t got the ability or the character to be anywhere else.
Its members are going to fester with envy and resentment of the more capable and successful racially distinct members of society forever.
It’s class resentment made far more toxic with a racial dimension. This is what our treacherous, cowardly and stupid political class have inflicted on us – a permanent source of social strife.
The BBC have finally mentioned race in their post riot analysis.In their website article “England Rioters poorer ,younger…” they quote Ministry of Justice figures :
“In terms of ethnicity, 42% of those charged were white, 46% black, 7% Asian and 5% were classified as “other”.” Thats out of 2000 charged so far,nationwide.
I like to think I did my bit to get those figures mentioned,as in previous analysis they ignored ethnicity.I and others pointed this out in the comments section after these articles .I also sent a complaint via their website( I recommend everyone puts in complaints to the BBC in this way,otherwise they will say “well no one complained”)