By Hogarth. To most indigenous Britons, the recent riots should have come as no surprise. They were bound to occur because multiracial societies are fundamentally unstable.
They will occur again. As the population of Britain becomes increasingly multiracial, they will also occur in increasing frequency and scale. This is what happens in multiracial societies. Certain ethnic elements are riot-prone, rampage-prone and plunder-prone.
Some years ago, a Japanese Minister was asked why Japan did not emulate Western countries and encourage immigration with a view to combating the demographic problem of aging. He simply justified the Japanese approach by stating that his country did not wish to duplicate the cultural problems multiracialism had caused to the UK and USA.
A previous Japanese Prime Minister referred to Japan as a “homogeneous nation” with “one ethnicity, one state and one language”. He further claimed that the “intellectual level” of Americans was below that of the Japanese because of the presence of certain population types within America, to which it would be superfluous to allude here.
In Japan, the legal authorities often explain that their low crime figures are a consequence of a mono-racial society.
In the UK, by contrast, the multiracial society has caused a tsunami of crime. So horrendous are the figures for certain ethnic elements that they are carefully censored.
The incidence of drug-dealing, knife crime, gun crime, mugging, street theft and similar activities amongst one particular ethnic group, for example, far exceeds their numbers as a proportion of the population. As long ago as 1971, police figures revealed that 80% of muggings in inner London were carried out by this group.
The indigenous British population has never been consulted about the imposition of the multiracial society which, in due course, will dispossess indigenous Britons from their own ancestral homeland, without any consent whatsoever.
Westminster MPs, meanwhile, preach the enrichment of multiculturalism but escape to live in the leafier mono-ethnic suburbs of the big cities or in the countryside, in properties that are too expensive for their constituents to afford. In so doing, they avail themselves of peaceful and stable communities, better schools for their children and cleaner and safer environs.
This two-tier society – which is one of double standards, sometimes known as Orwellian ‘double think’ – extends, in particular, to many of the well paid directors and employees of the politically-correct BBC.
Listening to the BBC’s radio reports, it is impossible to discern any reference to the ethnic origin of the rioters and looters. Were these elements Scots, Welsh, Irish, Germans? Could they have been from Israel or China? Were they representative of the general London population?
We know the answer to that from the film footage or the photographic reports of newspapers. This essential information is neither discussed nor debated by the BBC. Instead, it has sought to censor the facts and select the news, in line with the type of society its personnel have subversively promoted.
The politicised forces of law and order have become little more than an adjunct of the social services. Many police units watched whilst looters carried out wanton acts of destruction and widespread looting and theft. Compare that to their unnecessary and violent use of force against a peaceful protest by the Countryside Alliance in Parliament Square some few years ago, when law abiding country folk, dressed in ties and tweeds were charged, bloodied and assaulted by police thugs, viciously wielding batons.
Clearly, it is one law for the host community and another for the new settlers.
The same applies when it comes to taxpayers’ funding, so generously disbursed by our ‘representatives’. Peckham is a case in point: in recent years it has benefited from 2000 new homes, a new leisure centre, an award winning library, a new sports’ centre and £290m in regeneration. There is scant chance of similar construction and expenditure being disbursed in places like Penzance, the ex-mining communities of Wales, the NW or NE, where poverty is amongst the worst in the UK but where the population remains ethnically British.
Many of these events were well forecast by the famous politician, the late and lamented Enoch Powell MP, in a speech he delivered in 1968, abridged below.
EP: “In this country in 15 or 20 years’ time the black man will have the whip hand over the white man.”
Over 40 years later, prejudicial reporting, reverse discrimination, race relations legislation, lenient and favoured status policing – for fear of inflaming the sensitivities of non-native religions and ethnic groups – the erosion of freedom of association and carefully targeted public spending, all attest to the accuracy of that statement.
EP: “In 15 or 20 years, on present trends, there will be in this country three and a half million Commonwealth immigrants and their descendants. That is not my figure. That is the official figure given to parliament by the spokesman of the Registrar General’s Office. There is no comparable official figure for the year 2000, but it must be in the region of five to seven million, approximately one-tenth of the whole population, and approaching that of Greater London. Whole areas, towns and parts of towns across England will be occupied by sections of the immigrant and immigrant-descended population.”
Mr Powell urged prompt action to avoid the need to address worse difficulties in later years. In the same way, today, we must take prompt action to avoid an irreversible calamity in future years.
EP: “…Extreme urgency of action now, of just that kind of action which is hardest for politicians to take, action where the difficulties lie in the present but the evils to be prevented or minimised lie several parliaments ahead.”
The position, then, was relatively benign compared to the position we face today:
EP: “…as a nation to be permitting the annual inflow of some 50,000 dependants, who are for the most part the material of the future growth of the immigrant-descended population. It is like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre.”
He then refers to the real victims of discrimination, who have had imposed upon them the multiracial society and the requirements of the first Race Relations Act:
EP: “The discrimination and the deprivation, the sense of alarm and of resentment, lies not with the immigrant population but with those among whom they have come and are still coming.
“They found their wives unable to obtain hospital beds in childbirth, their children unable to obtain school places, their homes and neighbourhoods changed beyond recognition, their plans and prospects for the future defeated; at work they found that employers hesitated to apply to the immigrant worker the standards of discipline and competence required of the native-born worker; they began to hear, as time went by, more and more voices which told them that they were now the unwanted.
They now learn that a one way privilege is to be established by act of parliament; a law which cannot, and is not intended to, operate to protect them or redress their grievances is to be enacted to give the stranger, the disgruntled and the agent-provocateur the power to pillory them for their private actions.”
Prophetically, he then states:
EP: “As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding; like the Roman, I seem to see “the River Tiber foaming with much blood”. That tragic and intractable phenomenon which we watch with horror on the other side of the Atlantic but which there is interwoven with the history and existence of the States itself, is coming upon us here by our own volition and our own neglect.”
Despite the overwhelming support of the general public, the warnings of the Rt Hon Enoch Powell were ignored by the media, the BBC and Westminster.
Forty-three years later, our country is entering into what may be the final volume of its long and dignified history.
More generally, in the West, there is a clash of cultures and the final stages of a decline of Western civilisation.
Demographic change and the dependence of an increasing number of wealth absorbers on a diminishing number of wealth creators will create turmoil on a scale unknown since the sack of Rome in 410AD.
As the latest riots demonstrate, the threat to Britain, our culture, heritage and identity – and, indeed, to Western civilisation – is far greater than organisations such as the EDL, the Wilders movement in Holland and similar organisations elsewhere suggest, by their restricted focus on Islam.
Distinctive cultures come from distinctive peoples. Such a self-evident truism can only be evaded by deliberation and cowardice.