The BBC and the Left: Apologists for Tyranny and Mass Murder

By Tim Haydon.

BBC-Left-apologists-for-tyranny-mass-murder

 

The defence by Alan Bennett, the lefty playwright whose 80th birthday is being celebrated, of the most famous traitors in British history:  Kim Philby, Donald MacLean, Guy Burgess, John Cairncross and Anthony Blunt, who passed our secrets to the Soviet Union during the Cold War at a time when all must have known about the mass murders which that regime had undertaken, should surprise no one as should the fact that it took place in a BBC interview.

Bennett said that what these traitors did was excusable because, ’they thought that what they were doing something to improve things, that they were morally on the right side’.  What is repulsive about this attitude on the part of both Bennett and these traitors is at root the indifference it displays to the gut loyalty and gratitude that is due to one’s own people. It’s like spitting in the face of one’s family to whom one owes everything including one’s very being. It is the unnaturalness of it: the rejection of the human feeling for one’s own in preference for a vapid idea of the universal based on arrogant and in any case irrelevant assumptions of intellectual superiority, which disgusts.

Bennett’s apologia is precisely the excuse for the millions of deliberately engineered Soviet deaths that the Historian Eric Hobsbawm made in an interview with Simon Schama on the BBC shortly before that grisly old Marxist died in October 2012.  This merely confirmed what he had said at other times, for example on  Desert Island Discs when he declared that “the sacrifice of millions of lives” would have been worth the future communist society because “that’s what we felt when we fought the Second World War”.

And there have been other leftist apologists for terror and mass murder on the BBC. For example, one is liable (as has your writer) when turning on a programme about world music to find oneself listening to some admirer of Che Guevara, the executioner-in-chief of Castro’s  blood –drenched Cuban dictatorship.  It should never be forgotten, but conveniently often is by his many admirers amongst ‘Progressives’ in the BBC and the rest of the political class, that when Castro came to power he turned his country into a huge Gulag devoid of personal freedom. About half a million people (out of a population of 11 millions) have been through his camps. This is the highest proportion of political prisoners in the world.  More than 15,000 people have been executed by firing squad. Torture methods include electric shocks, incarceration in dark cells no bigger than coffins, being deprived of water for long periods, being beaten with bayonets, electric cables and truncheons, being forced to bathe in faeces and urine and so on and on.  One hears a lot about rendition and Guantanamo Bay on the BBC.  How much about the decades of torture in Cuba do we hear?

Of course, one is likely to wait a very long time indeed before one is ever likely to see some  old Nazi  excusing the excesses of the Third Reich on the ‘unbiased and balanced’ BBC,  or the views of an historian like David Irving. No programme has been broadcast featuring an admirer of the Chilean Dictator Augusto Pinochet, but Isabel, the daughter of the Marxist Salvador Allende, the man he deposed, has been feted on the BBC as a celebrity. Allende was elected with 36% of the vote in a split election but believed himself to have a mandate to ram through a hard-core Marxist program of expropriation and indoctrination. In the process he left Chile’s economy in ruins and trampled the rule of law so badly he brought his country to the brink of civil war.

Pinochet came to the rescue of his country when requested to do so by the legislature which charged Allende with 22 constitutional violations. He was successful in galvanising Chile, now one of the most successful countries in the Americas, although nothing can excuse the way his regime hunted down and eliminated Allende’s supporters. This political vindictiveness was very much the leftist way of doing things. Still, there is no Pinochet Avenue in the New Town your writer occasionally drives through, but there is an Allende Avenue to match Mandela  Avenue.

One could go on about the worship of  the impartial and balanced BBC and its staff of bloody-handed West-hating regimes, noting in passing the way that Barbara Plett, BBC’s Middle East correspondent cried when reporting the death of Yasser Arafat.   The PLO under Arafat perpetrated many atrocities of the most stomach-churning sort. It murdered some 100,000 civilians in South Lebanon between 1975 and 1981. Arafat invented modern terrorism. David Horowitz wrote (Unholy Alliance 145):

‘With the help of the Castro dictatorship, Arafat established the first terrorist training camps and launched the first international campaign of airline hijackings and hostage taking’.

In short, just the sort of person for a radical leftist, West-hating, ‘oppression ‘ hunting BBC functionary to weep over

Bookmark the permalink.

10 Comments

  1. There is a mindset on the left that social progress can only be achieved after massive suffering. This then tends to get turned round and becomes ‘if the left inflict massive suffering they must be heading in the right direction’.

    The sort of people who purvey this stuff tend to live very comfortable lives themselves and view other people’s suffering with a great deal of detachment. Alan Bennett certainly fits the pattern as did the ghastly Hobsbawm. The BBC lefty class.

    If there is one thing we should have learnt from the last century it’s to look for incremental progress if possible.

  2. Yes, the more suffering,, the more they support the regime. When the suffering eases off, they lose Interest.

    This is what happened with Mao. Mao worship was at its height when the man was murdering millions but the left lost interest when things quietened down,. The same phenomenon occurred with other bloodthirsty leftist regimes such as South Vietnam and Ho Chi Minh and the Sandanistas in Nicaragua..

  3. There can be no excuses for mass murder, whether perpetrated by Communists or Fascists. The fact that the BBC can give airtime to excuse mass murder by Communists says everything that we need to know about both past and present members of that organization. How I resent paying the BBC licence fee…

  4. To be fair to the Soviet Union, they did achieve the fastest doubling of life expectancy in history and their tyranny was no worse than the Tsarist tyranny that went before.

  5. The Tsarist regime had the fastest rising standard of living in the world before the War and the Revolution, the United States not excepted. The rising expectations this encouraged were major reasons for the Revolution.

    It was paternalistic at best and oppressive at worst. The Soviet Union, however was uniformly tyrannical in the extreme and in a class of its own when it came to sheer murderousness..

    According to Rummel’s ‘Death by Government’, 61,911,000 people were murdered by the ‘Soviet Gulag State’, a stupefying figure of inconceivable suffering also arrived at by Solzhenitsyn.

    • Do you have a source for the claim that the Tsarist regime had ‘the fastest rising standard of living in the world’? Fast economic growth maybe, but this didn’t lead to rises in the living standards of ordinary people (hence the revolution).

      Since the Soviet archives were opened we have a much clearer picture of the number of people killed by the Soviet government and it was certainly nowhere near the figure you’ve quoted.

  6. The rate of economic increase was greater in pre Revolutionary Russia than any where else at times and amongst the leaders at others.

    Statistics on living standards are sketchy and Russia is an enormous country. All the same, it is reasonable to think that the rapid industrialisation of the country was reflected in increased living standards of the workers, certainly in industrial centres.

    Russian peasants could be quite well off, comparatively speaking. A weaver in some parts of the country could earn enough in a day to buy ten times the grain that a weaver in Germany could. Russian peasants in general ate as well as the Germans did in the 1950’s.

    As for the mass murders in the Soviets, refer to Rummel at the following:

    http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/NOTE1.HTM

    .

    aincrease in eincrese in the wages of workers in the industrial cetres was relcted in other parts.

  7. I like the valuable information you provide in your articles.
    I will bookmark your weblog and check again here regularly.
    I’m quite sure I will learn many new stuff right here!

    Best of luck for the next!

Leave a Reply

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked *