John Bean’s Nationalist Notebook – No.10

 

ITV Chooses  Indian Girl to Relive Zeppelin Raids

Those of us who have attacked the BBC for its promotion of a multiracial and multicultural Britain tend to overlook that ITV, in both national and local programmes,  has not been exactly backward  in pushing the same agenda.

On January 6^th ITV’s evening Anglia News featured a worthy project that has been set up by some of the schools in East Anglia. This is to associate themselves with soldiers from the  region and also the people at home during the First World War. The school featured in the programme – unlike Luton, Bedford or Peterborough – was in a rural area. Of the dozen or so young teenagers shown, all  bar one Indian girl appeared to be of British/European appearance. The particular subject in the WW1 project that was being featured was the first Zeppelin raid on England in January 1915 when two people were killed in Yarmouth and King’s Lynn. One girl only was chosen to discuss its effects as if she was there, and that was  the Indian  girl – and she did it well.

The point here is that logically one would think that she could, for example, give a view on the part played in WW1 by the million or more Indians who served in the Indian Army with distinction. But no, the ITV producer and/or editor blatantly used the event to promote the image that Asians have been a prominent part of our population for several centuries.

I have commented in this notebook previously that the ITV Anglia News regularly has an editor with an Indian name. No names of production staff were given in this instance. It is just as likely that this little episode of brainwashing was dreamed up by a white Briton who is a recent product of our universities.  It is probably another example of the long-term success by incremental steps of the Marxist-minded and liberal-minded ‘useful idiots’ who have made up the bulk of our teachers at schools and universities over the past 30 years and which has encouraged  the nation to reject its cultural heritage without realising it.

 

Selected ‘Truth’ About Immigration

The day after the above example of ITV’s efforts to promote the acceptance of our alleged multiracial history,  BBC2 broadcast  its much heralded programme on The Truth About Immigration. Presented by the oleaginous Nick Robinson, BBC political editor and racist-witch-finder general, it should have been called Selected Truth About Immigration.

Robinson spent the first 37 minutes of the hour-long programme  discussing Polish and other East European immigration, with lengthy interviews with these immigrants, who are predominantly hard-working and do not seek benefits. Positive comments far outweighed the negative, such as pressure on the NHS, housing and schools, and the fact that Sheffield Pakistanis are not over happy with the customs of the Roma. Robinson ended the programme with another five minutes on the East Europeans.

This left less than 18 minutes shared with showing us an admittedly entertaining festival of the Sikh community in Southampton, and the hard times of the Bangladeshis in East London who consider it beneath their dignity to work in restaurants.

Not one word was uttered throughout the programme on the effects of immigration of Africans, Pakistanis, and those who have come here from the Middle East. These areas in total are the source of more than half of our immigrants. Add those who came here from India and it is two-thirds. Thus, it would suggest the BBC and the liberal-left media spokesmen and women are trying to get us to believe that the only problems caused by immigration are those caused  by fellow Europeans (which does not include Roma).

A further trick by Robinson was to set himself up as a pie man during his Southampton visit. To ‘selected’ passers-by he offered slices of the pie that matched in size their view of the percentage of immigrants in our population. His ‘selection’ was 12.5  per cent – one in eight. That was official, he implied, but did not give any reference as to why. The only way you can get this figure is to  exclude any person born in Britain with immigrant parents, let alone grandparents.

 

How Afro-Asians Won WW 1

Selecting facts to prove our fictitious Afro-Asian multiracial history is also appearing in plans to mark the centenary of the First World War.

It is now 50 years since the BBC showed its excellent 26 hours series programme on “The Great War”. With repeats I have probably seen every instalment twice in that period. I cannot recall ever seeing West Indian/African or even Indian Army soldiers going over the top at the Somme or other classic Western Front battleground. There is no doubt that some Indian regiments were involved in front line action in France.  African soldiers from our colonies were almost exclusively utilised in the campaign in East Africa against mainly African soldiers fighting for the Kaiser! But this time round the BBC looks to be planning a more cosmopolitan look at the centenary of that first instalment of the tragic bloodbaths that have led to Europe as a cultural identity now being on the edge of extinction.

As for our Government, it is trying to double back on “social engineering” plans  to mark this centenary – see Daily Telegraph 10.1.2014.

Objections have already been raised to the claims that the role of Australian and New Zealand (Anzac) soldiers, along with Canadians and South Africans is being down-played in favour of the contribution from new Commonwealth nations. Critics have accused ministers of political correctness and rewriting history. Surely, this is an established fact by now in any Lib-Lab-Con ministerial gathering?

Apparently, talks on the Government’s  plans did not even mention Australia or New Zealand but concentrated on promoting in particular India, Bangladesh, Nigeria and other West African Nations (most of which did not exist by name before 1950).

The BDP recognises that African and Indian soldiers in particular fought and died supporting the old British Empire (which we do not propose to resurrect) and this should never be forgotten.  But we oppose this latest attempt to rewrite history in order to promote a multiracial society and ignore the death of 62,0000 Australians, 18,000 New Zealanders, 67,000 Canadians and 12,000 South Africans who volunteered to come to the aid of the mother country.

 

The New Nationalism as I see it

The growing popularity of this website is partly the reward for the excellent articles that it carries on the harm to our national economy brought about by global capitalism and well thought out ways of overcoming this. Nevertheless, I would point out that we can recover from economic downturns and even from EU and United Nations political, cultural  and economic interference.  But once our ethnicity (which means ‘race’) is altered it is altered for ever.  As I have said before, those who cannot accept this and would have us soften our opposition to immigration and make it a secondary issue to withdrawal from the EU or revitalising a Christian Britain, for example,  should join either UKIP or a monastery.

In order to diminish the effects of the opposition’s charges that we are racially obsessed our general leaflets and election material should limit the description of our British ancestry – whether English, Scottish, Welsh or Irish – as being ‘European’. We can be a little more specific in articles by pointing out that to describe  Britain as already being a nation of immigrants is a nonsense in that Angles, Saxons, Vikings, Normans, and Huguenots all came from a few hundred miles away in Northern Europe and were of kindred stock. For those members – and certainly branch officials – who wish to find out more on the composition of the ethnic stock whose existence we are trying to defend we should guide them into the direction of the invaluable material being put into print by Arthur Kemp and Ostara Publications, such as Arthur’s Four Flags. Here, for example, they can learn about the importance of the distribution of the R1b1 DNA type.

Even on our website, articles discussing this can be off-putting to the new voters we are trying to capture in our time limit. A passing reference: yes. It can encourage the few to find out more and we must make sure that the right material that will destroy the shibboleths of multiracialism is available.

At present possibly a slender majority of UK voters would accept the view that although one race may not be superior to another per se, each has a different culture and that difference is what we are defending. Therefore, in party publications we should run articles from time to time on the cultures of non-European races. This presents no problems with the history of India, China and Japan, although it might be more difficult with Africa.

It probably goes without saying that, irrespective of what we all feel, the voting public will be more likely to support the British Democrats if we give more attention to the economic costs of immigration and criminality amongst some sections of it. Romanian pickpockets have been in the news for example. Several articles on this website have shown that mass immigration costs the taxpayer £3 billion per annum

We need a different stance on Europe to show the brain-washed electorate that our brand of nationalism is based on the realities of the 21^st century. We are offering something new and not regurgitating old  NF/BNP policies which the public believed were steeped in the aggression that went with nationalism of Hitler, Mussolini and Franco in the 1930s and 40s.

As I have stated before, one of our campaigns should be for a European Confederation  of national sovereign states – or at least a Forum as a stepping stone. Our voters are decidedly fed up with the interference of the EU, now aspiring to be a Soviet superstate, but are reluctant to withdraw from Europe completely. This is partly due to becoming aware of our similarities as well as our differences resulting from mass holiday travel since the 1970s. We can say that what we offer is the economic co-prosperity sphere that was promised us under the original idea of a European Common Market. All legislation passed by the EU that a Confederation would replace should become null and void. This point ensures that voters are not under the misapprehension that a Confederation is similar to a Federal Union such as the EU – in fact it must guarantee the rights of the individual nation states including immigration control.

Pressure for a Confederation – or Co-operative – will, and must, come from below; from the peoples of the European nations rather than being imposed from above like the EU proto-superstate. It is already supported by the new nationalism of  Marine Le Pen’s FN and similar movements in the Netherlands and Austria

The Eurozone common currency will probably collapse within the next two years. We will naturally welcome this and point out that the freedom for nation states to fix their own interest rates in their own currencies will be an important stimulus to stabilising the Europe-wide depression that is likely to remain for this period or longer.  A Confederation would aid this stabilisation and long-term recovery.

As it is, our exports to the rest of Europe are 57% of our total and give us 55% of our imports. The next market of note is the USA with 15 % of our exports and 9% of imports. We do not support the UKIP view of metaphorically moving the British Isles to mid-Atlantic and seeking trade and political co-operation primarily with the United States. This is what one would expect from a movement that has its roots in the Tory party.