“Honour Violence” Entrenched in Britain: How Much More Evidence do the Liberals Need?

The news that there has been a 57 percent rise in “honour” style violence in Britain over the previous two years is conclusive evidence that Third World immigration is causing the importation of Third World culture, and not “assimilation” and “Britishness” as the liberals pretend.

According to a report issued by the “Iran and Kurdish Women’s Rights Organisation” (IKWRO), headquartered, of course, in London, more than 2800 incidents of ‘honour’ based violence were reported to police across the UK last year.

This is nearly double the number reported the previous year, and IKWRO said that a further 500 incidents may have been reported to police forces who did not respond to the Freedom on Information requests which were submitted to them.

“These figures demonstrate that ‘honour’ based violence is not a minor problem but a very serious issue which affects thousands of people each year, many of whom will suffer high levels of abuse before they seek help,” a IKWRO spokesman was quoted as saying.

London, which has been the most heavily colonised and ethnically cleansed of white British people, has an “honour” violence rate of five times the national average.

A further indication of the spread and overrunning of even further outlying parts of Britain was the news that “honour” violence has tripled in Northumberland as well.

According to IKWRO, the five worst areas are:

1. London 495 incidents.

2 West Midlands 378 incidents.

3. West Yorkshire   350 incidents.

4. Lancashire 227 incidents.

5. Manchester 189 incidents.

Liberals have, typically, responded to this news with another bout of evasive handwringing and meaningless nonsense.

The Metropolitan Police, for example, told a media outlet that it had embarked on a “significant journey regarding how we police honour-based violence over the past decade, and has played an instrumental part in developing work in this field” — whatever that might mean.

Just like the recent riots in London, none dare say the R-word, namely that it is a question of race.

Andrew Brons MEP told the European Parliament earlier this year that it was a delusion to think that Third World immigrants shed their culture “like coats” at passport control and suddenly became European as soon as they set foot in Europe.

The dramatic rise in “honour” violence is directly linked to the racial demographic change underway in Britain — and nothing else.

Unless the current tidal wave of Third World immigration is halted, and reversed, Britain will be overrun and destroyed before the end of this century.

Just how much more evidence do liberals need before they will see the suicidal nature of their policies? Let us pray that the answer is not too much.

See also: Can the BNP’s Immigration Policy Stop the Ethnic Cleansing of our Nation?

Bookmark the permalink.

6 Comments

  1. The problem will be far greater than reported here. I heard that the muslim community very much like to keep this type of problem “in house”, therefor the police in many cases wont even know or suspect anything is going on.
    It’s been going on for years, lets face it. Previous governments have swept the problem under the carpet as they have done with grooming.

  2. Britain will be overrun before the end of the century! Get real, we have at the most 10 years left. Ethnics now have the majority in under18s in over 40 cities & london boroughs! Immigration is at record levels & anti-white male cultural marxism rules the roost. Islam proclaims ‘Allah has given them this country’ every day in every mosque. They are in a hurry to make this happen. We have 2 hopes 1) economic crisis politices the whites as an ethnic group. 2) Islam makes a premature grab for power & creates a backlash.

  3. Andrew Brons’ is quite obviously correct when he says that “… it was a delusion to think that Third World immigrants shed their culture ‘like coats’ at passport control and suddenly became European as soon as they set foot in Europe”.
    .
    The English Democrats’ have a good definition of ‘the English’ and ‘Englishness’ in their manifesto, which is:
    .
    “3.17.2 The English can be defined in the same way that other nations are defined. To be English is to be part of a community. We English share a communal history, language and culture. We have a communal identity and memory. We share a ‘we’ sentiment; a sense of belonging. These things cannot be presented as items on a checklist. Our community, like others, has no easily defined boundaries but we exist and we have the will to continue to exist”.
    .
    But the manifesto then completely contradicts this when it goes on to say:
    .
    “ 3.18.1 – The people of England are all those UK citizens who live in England”.
    .
    and:
    ” 3.18.2 – In electoral terms, the people of England are all those UK citizens who are on the electoral roll of an English constituency”. This is despite, under current electoral law, the electoral rolls including all EU and Commonwealth citizens residing here – about a quarter of the world, and now Mozambique and Rwanda which were never even part of the British Empire!
    .
    and:
    “3.18.3 – The people of England therefore includes the people of many nations, all of whom share a common UK citizenship”.

    I agree with many if not most of the English Democrats’ policies but the nonsense and woolly thinking of these latter three fundamental clauses of their manifesto are why I cannot support them, and why I await (with increasing concern at the delay) the transformation of Andrew’s parallel party into a fully fledged one.

  4. Enriched By Violence from Ethnics ? why would i be enriched by there violence.

  5. this is not the only culture being imported by the lib lab conmen we also have knife culture,gun culture,drug culture,forced marriage mobrule etc etc need i go on??

Leave a Reply

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked *