Babies, Benefits and Colonisation

By Southwest Nationalist. Well, it took someone born in Lahore to say it – probably the only way to escape the accusations of racism that would pour in thick and fast if anyone else spoke out – but Baroness Shreela Flather has stated a truth that we’ve all known, and many of us have warned about, for years.

Some foreigners – and she singles out Pakistanis and Bangladeshis – are having more children because it brings them benefits and a bigger house.

“The minority communities in this country, particularly the Pakistanis and the Bangladeshis, have a very large number of children and the attraction is the large number of benefits that follow the child….Nobody likes to accept that, nobody likes to talk about it because it is supposed to be very politically incorrect”.

Just one rephrase, nobody is allowed to talk about that, cries of racism are what would greet our words. It’s not that people don’t like to, it’s that the PC system has stifled all debate.

You’ll put them in a tricky position though, a peer born in Lahore mentioning Pakistanis and Bangladeshis. They’ll probably just bury it without a mention, the racism card would be a tough one to play.

Many of us have been saying it for years though, we have seen huge families subsidised by the British taxpayer, watched as in effect we pay for our own colonisation.

The perfect system was created for immigrants to have children like it was going out of fashion, where they would be rewarded for this, and by God have many taken advantage of Britain’s stupidity.

It is by no coincidence that we see birth rates falling among the indigenous, yet going through the roof for certain minority groups – we’ve handed them every incentive.

Britain has, quite simply, encouraged peoples from the world over to settle here, and once here has given them every encouragement to raise huge families.

We hand reward after reward to our colonisers, and we are forbidden from saying a thing about it because to do so would be racist.

As for doing anything about it, well, racist too, there’s the EHRC and human rights waiting in the wings.

Who can really blame the immigrants, it is the idiocy of those who subverted the system into a politically correct monolith pandering to every minority need which has led us to here.

A moronic system which functions to impose diversity and the decline of the indigenous, that’s exactly what we have in the UK.

Thinking that foreign cultures would suddenly adapt to British ways and have miniscule families, especially when there are financial incentives to breed like rabbits, is symptomatic of the ludicrous idea of integration which has been foisted on us.

It is not by accident that the system was created whereby we were forced to allow millions into Britain, and then we handed them every incentive to raise huge families, it was a deliberate move and part of the attempts to create a multicultural society.

We witnessed a perfect storm of immigration, encouragement to immigrants to have large families, and it being taboo for the British people to speak of it.

Those conditions did not occur by accident, nor do they remain in place by accident.

Benefits and babies are another arm in the colonisation of the UK, we’re paying the costs incurred along the way to our own demise as a people.

Bookmark the permalink.

11 Comments

  1. It should be noted that Baroness Shreela Flather is not a Pakistani in origin. She was born in Lahore to a Sikh family before the partition of India. This does not mean that she shares the hostility that exists between many Moslems and Sikhs, particularly as she is now a leading figure in the British Humanist organisation.
    Nevertheless, thanks to Southwest Nationalist for providing this further information on how the aboriginal Brits are being outbred.

    • Thank you – I’d sent in the correction not long after this went live, the original Pakistani reference which appeared briefly was an error on my part.

      I’d note also her previous position as UK rep on the EU Advisory Commission on Racism and Xenophobia, it’s interesting in reference to this that should she make these comments since many would be shot down for daring to even think them.

      It seems that those running the show here in Britain are last to wake up (or, deliberately close their eyes or know full well but say/do nothing) – even the foreign born can see and now openly say that we’re a magnet for huge immigrant families, even if they won’t take the obvious step and concede that Britain is being colonised at an alarming rate.

  2. It is a modern day heresy to talk about immigration, never mind the disproportionately large number of children that some of these immigrants have, especially Muslims. While our own people are having fewer and fewer children we are also told in the media that there is a serious shortage of midwives in certain parts of England because the birth rate has become so high there. The areas where there are the highest shortages of midwives are the East Midlands, Eastern and South East England. Of course, there’s no mention of the origins of the majority of the mothers to be in the media. I am reminded of the wise words of Enoch Powell when he said; “We must be mad, literally mad, as a nation to be permitting the annual inflow of some 50,000 dependants, who are for the most part the material of the future growth of the immigrant descended population. It is like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre. So insane are we that we actually permit unmarried persons to immigrate for the purpose of founding a family with spouses and fiancées whom they have never seen.”. How true his words still are today.

    • Geoff. Immigrants, especially Muslims are having much larger families here in the UK than they would in their own country. Why not ? our idiotic government is paying for every birth they have. More births, more UK taxpayers money.
      The answer to the immigrant problem is really simple, if applied.
      1. no welfare payments of any kind to immigrants or asylum seekers.
      Immigrants are payings thousands of pounds to be brought into this country. They expect to make a profit on this investment, and they do. Immgrants are not flooding into the UK because they love our people or our culture, quite the reverse, many hold what we value with open contempt.
      2. no right to vote in UK elections for a period of at least 10 years.
      3. Babies born of immigrants in the uk NOT to be classed as British. My friend was born in Switzerland of Spanish parents. Her Nationality ? Spanish. The Swiss have been far more intelligent with immigrants than have all our previous governments.
      Giving birth in the UK should not be a right to British nationality.
      4. British citizenship should only be awarded to immgrants for service to this country. Serving under fire in the British forces for a period of at least 10 years could be an example.
      It is my hope that a new Nationalist Party will adopt these policies, Citizenship must classed as a valued award and the award withdrawn if any awarded the citizenship commits a criminal act of any sort.
      We have devalued our British citizenship by handing it out to the Riff Raff of the world.
      Can we redeem this sick situation.?

      • I agree with what you say here. Roger, but I would like to add one other stipulation. British citizenship should not be regarded as a right, but as a privilege, as you specify in item 4 of your posting. And I would like a future government to have the authority to withdraw this privilege if ever it is abused. Any immigrant who has British citizenship, but who then breaks the law, should immediately have their citizenship status permanently revoked, which would also cancel their National Insurance number, thereby also cancelling any possibility of benefits of any kind and losing the individual any right to remain in our country, entirely regardless of their “personal circumstances”.

        • I fully agree Peter.
          There is a misconception that, having a British passport is a right to citizenship, is isn’t and never was. It does give the bearer the right to freely travel without let or hinderence.
          As you rightly say, citizenship should be a guarded priviledge awarded for services to the country, and withdrawn for any criminal misdemeanor.

  3. Just to add to my earlier comment, if Enoch Powell were to be making that same speech today I’m sure he would have added something along the lines; “We are now even encouraging the growth in that immigrant population by our generous benefits system, which gives priority to every new immigrant on every council housing list. So insane are we that we even encourage them to have larger and larger families by giving them increasing amounts of benefit money for each new child. Surely, with this kind of social policy we will guarantee that we become an ethnic minority in our own land within the space of just one lifetime.”

  4. It’s the old old story all over again. You cannot make poor people rich by making rich people poor. Eventually everyone finishes up poor except an elite leadership. Examples abound all over Africa and Asia.
    It also follows that you cannot make poor countries rich by making rich countries poor. Eventually everyone becomes poor. That is what communism was all about.
    The only way to tackle this stupity is to elect a government who only make decisions based on common sense. Throw away the HRA and the EHRC and the PC handbook etc and govern by Brass Tacks.
    Son-of-Sommevet

  5. Baroness Shreela Flather is no friend of ours, but this is the second comment I have seen her make in a week which is of the kind that only a non-white person could really make without getting shouted down and forced to resign in these ‘pc’ days.

    Her comments about large families here are of course correct, as is this article when it points to our displacement. What I didn’t see her mentioning was the act of “fecundism” (or fecundity) which no doubt also drives this higher birthrate. Fecundism is important because, after all, demographics is destiny.

    She also had something important to say here in this clip about the commonwealth (and I presume, the developing world):

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b014k65j/House_of_Lords_Commonwealth/

    (fast forward to 2hours 17mins).

    The clip is deleted 8.45am Friday (tomorrow) so catch it now if you are interested. I have hopefully recorded a copy to my hard drive for future use, should ever there be a use for it.

    In it, she essentially states that the demographic bulge needs tackling in the Commonwealth and that measures should be looked at to curb population growth there, and that there is little point banging on about light bulbs and cycling to work here when the ‘taboo’ of emerging demographics are not being tackled. (And all say all of us!)

    She also pointed to the overwhelming lack of order and rule of law in many commonwealth countries and how important it was to have it installed before any other measures or expectations can be placed on all the other problems which tend to blight them…..which was a far cry from the gibbering, wet, nauseating, glib, folly, and downright idiotic blathering coming from the rest of the programmes participants.

    One particular clown from Wales (think it was liberal democrat) was gushing about welcoming a cultural activity of bongo players and dancers and such for an event in the future, and how it unites us all, and who cares if the Scots have their bagpipes and the Welsh have their harps, etc, cos we are all unified……. What a pillock.

    I never watch the Lords debates, I was pointed to it earlier this week. But if that commonwealth debate/discussion is anything to go off – may God help all of us!

  6. The Constitution states that no foreign born person may sit in either House, as Mr Brons knows very well. And since the days of High Traitor Heath it could be argued that every Parliament since has been a treasonous parliament, and thus all laws passed and immigrants and their descendent have no lawful basis.

    Moreover, as Islam is actually a political ideology with a religious aspect to replace the Constitution with Sharia Law, it too, and all it’s followers – every single one – are unlawfully present in the islands, and may potentially be treated as enemy combatants.

  7. “There are signs that Allah will grant Islam victory in Europe – without swords, without guns, without military conquest. We don’t need terrorists; we don’t need homicide bombers. The fifty million Muslims [in Europe] will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades.”

    Colonel MUAMMAR GADDAFI, Al Jazeera Television, 10 April 2006.

Leave a Reply

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked *